
![]()
Office of the President
April 15, 2004
From: Thomas J. Meyer
Subject: Final Exam – The Modern Community College
To: Dr. Smith
Dear Dr. Smith:
As the founding president of Metropolitan United Community College (MUCC), it is my pleasure to present to you and to the community of Metro City this general budget proposal and its rationale in the form of an Internet Explorer webpage for your approval. This webpage has twelve dozen linked bookmarks enabling you to move through the parts of the document and to examine numbered explanatory notes at the click of a mouse. To obtain these advantages, I wish to say that the preferred method for studying the document is to view it online. However, if you must print yourself a copy, remember to print webpage documents in using your printer's "landscape" setting rather than its traditional "portrait" setting. The decisions regarding academic programs, the faculty, the academic support services and staff, and the institutional support services and staff have been mine to ponder, and I accept the responsibility for initiating the budgetary proposals, and coordinating the efforts of the human resources I have thought it in the interest of Metro City to hire to make part of my “team.”
I have listed some of the assumptions underlying the nature of your directive to me. I have met, and in some cases exceeded the 7 criteria you established for me. I am pleased to report that your expectations and those of the town council can be achieved in a frugal manner that does not compromise the comprehensive nature of MUCC, that I have ignored the political temptation to receive monies in return for hiring a relative of a state senator unless that person compete and be chosen as best qualified, and then only if the senator's proposal first undergoes the scrutiny of yourself and the town council and receives your consideration and recommendation for my approval.
In every other respect you will find that I am prepared to utilize all of the resources allotted in the manner which I believe most clearly earns your approval. When on three occasions additional judgments on my part were necessary, I made those decisions which are open to you now in the following bullet statements:
|
In one instance, "travel and supplies for adjunct faculty," your guidance was not as clear as I might have hoped for. Some colleges might exclude such monies for adjuncts; but a case can be made for their inclusion and I believed the expenditure would enhance the professional development and morale of the adjuncts, lead to improved classes and equipment in classes taught by adjuncts, bring professional comradeship and a sense of inclusion to all faculty full and part-time, and in a conservative sense, meet with your studied approval. | |
|
In a second instance, under Other Understandings, although I hired in excess of 20 Technical full-time and adjunct faculty combined, so as not to be criticized by you I hired a Public Relations Consultant in the event my 19 Full-time Technical faculty fell short of your expectation. To insure a comprehensive technical training program I "beefed" up adjuncts of all kinds by providing them travel and supply allotments. In the case of technical training programs this amounted to $10,000 per faculty member, ($100,000 in the case of all adjunct technical faculty) and was done to impress upon you that I was cognizant of the emphasis you placed on balancing the missions within a comprehensive community college. | |
|
In a third instance, I discovered an error in your reasoning about the parameters, and though I followed your guidance, this "trumpet call" caused me to include some procedures for making the review of the budgetary process, its assumptions, its parameters, and its town council guidance part and parcel of a recurring annual process in self-improvement of our administrative procedures. The particular error to which I refer was the parameter in retention. The guidance said that full time faculty generate 80 second year students for second year attendance. However, on careful reflection I noted that by teaching five classes per semester, it would be better to re-estimate retention as 80 per semester, and perhaps as much as 160 per academic year. We shall appoint my vice-presidents of academic affairs and financial affairs to co-chair a committee whose purpose is to recommend amendments to our assumptions and parameters for our next usage of our budgetary model. To console you about this particular shortcoming, let me tell you that no model captures reality in all its complexity, and we would error if we believed that it did. May I include a short story to that effect from my own military experience? I remember the first use of models and sophisticated flight simulators that initially, and on paper, allowed computers to generate great-circle routes for military aircraft dispatched on a moment's notice. Since I helped direct our airborne warning and control (AWAC) crews to global positions with such minimum response times, I was practical enough to realize that sending AWACs aircraft from their home station to the Middle East in the event of an immediate threat there should not be done by computer flight planning alone. Such great circle - shortest distance - flight planning took the airplanes over downtown Moscow, and so the results of instant modeling could not be approved. |
You can "mouse about" in the
following document found beneath my signature if you have opened it successfully
as the FrontPage document on Internet as I created it. It will run on
Internet Explorer, but I dissuade you from running it on Netscape Navigator.
Send me your questions, or considerations so that I may allay your concerns, or
sharpen your sensitivities about the funding process. If I don't have the
immediate answer, I will provide you an approximate time when I expect to be
able to respond to your needs. Thank you for the opportunity to serve you
and the people of Metropolitan City. Should you need to link to the
document directly, use the following directions:
1st, type http://www.ph.vccs.edu/eco
into Internet Explorer.
2nd, scroll down my "homepage" nearly to the bottom, and click on the word
"Administration."
3rd, scroll down the page known as "Administration"
beyond work being completed for "Statistics" and click on the link beneath Dr.
Marshall which should take you to
Metropolitan United Community College.
4th, if you choose to ignore the advantages of a linked document and
simply wish to print the document, use "landscape" (11" X 8.5") rather than
"portrait" (8.5" X 11")on your printer settings.
If I may be of further assistance, do not fail to ask!
Sincerely yours,
Thomas J. Meyer
Thomas J. Meyer
President, Metropolitan United Community College
Metro City, VA
tmeyer@ph.vccs.edu
(276) 656-0283
![]()
To enlighten the community and solidify its support I have paid particular attention to the guidance I received from you, and am responding to your needs using Microsoft Word to present my rationale, and using Microsoft Excel to express the budgetary numbers.
Assumptions:
1. My understanding is that the state legislature has offered initial
support subsidizing the first three years of the core staff of the college, that
is, 13 positions and appropriate support staff beginning with my own presidency
and including six vice-presidents; and six directors.
2. In addition the legislature has provided the entire cost of physical plant maintenance to include personnel, supervisors, supplies, equipment, and utilities.
General Instructions to the reader:
1. Use the following table of bookmarks to take you
to the various parts of this budget rationale and included Excel spreadsheet.
2. Use the back button (arrow) on you computer to return to a previous
position.
|
|
| The Budget Rationale |
The Excel Spreadsheet
Each line in the Excel Spreadsheet is numbered
sequentially. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Part I -
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Part II -
Numbered explanatory notes
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Part III - Making the Budget into a Continuous Planning Cycle
|
|
![]()
PART I - MEETING THE SEVEN CRITERIA
Per my question to you via Teletechnet, I
am also relieved of the responsibility for creating the location, buildings, and
grounds, so that my report will consist only of a budget and rationale for the
use of $10 million provided by Metro City for the initial year’s budget, and is
subject to meeting seven criteria mentioned on the second page of your written
guidance to me. I shall address each of your specific tasking requirements
briefly, and then continue my rationale in more general terms:
1. PERSONNEL
Regarding the task of creating personnel slots for faculty, administrators, and staff not listed above, the Excel spreadsheet will provide you monetary costs for hiring in budget categories A through P the necessary persons to simultaneously satisfy requirements 2 through 7. Items F, G, H, M and O in that list do NOT involve expenditures for personnel, and refer respectively to monies allotted to non-traditional delivery stipends, budget reserve, library contribution, Phi Theta Kappa, and arbitrary extras. The reasons for a category know as arbitrary extras are that initial guidance from you was not clear as to whether or not travel and supplies monies should be made available to adjunct faculty in the arts and sciences and adjunct faculty in the technical training areas. Not wishing to fall short of your expectations, I budgeted for supplies and travel for the adjuncts as well as the full-time A&S and full-time technical training faculty. The second reason for including these questionable arbitrary expenses was that it will be a positive morale builder and professional development activity encouraging adjuncts to compete for permanent positions and to bring to the community college students their best talents and tools and those which we can afford to provide for them. When you study budget categories A through P you will also notice that items K and N involve more than personnel expenditures. Items K and N include monies that provide supplies for intramural athletics and clothing, travel, and related expenses for student ambassadors.
2. COMPREHENSIVE
COMMUNITY COLLEGE (The priorities of the college)
To design an appropriate balance among elements of the mission statement for
Metropolitan United Community College I sought to include flexible components
responsive to changing needs. Without setting component sizes concretely, I
sought to achieve results for Metro City students wherein:
Priority 1 - the transfer function of sending
our 2-year graduates on to 4-year institutions would have the highest priority;
Priority 2 - the teaching of technical training in
preparation for vocational employment upon completion of certificates or
diplomas became the second priority;
Priority 3 - the provision of remediation in
learning so as to equip otherwise incapable students to succeed in college
became my third priority;
Priority 4 - the development of community-based
training programs to aid and attract industry to Metro City became my fourth
priority;
Priority 5 - the construction of synergistic
services that would provide financial aid, community service, and competitive
image of success became my fifth priority;
Priority 6 - the underwriting of a college
endowment fund became my sixth priority as a means of solidifying continued
support and good will with the frugal city fathers who need to know that we have
provided for our own posterity;
Priority 7 - the continuing dialogue with the
legislature regarding political monies not wholly academic in nature I regard as
my seventh priority;
Priority 8 - my eighth priority is to invent an
alumni association from which we can continue to draw good will and future
interest;
Priority 9 - my ninth priority is to pay attention
to federal funding and grant monies of all sorts so as to be responsive to
forthcoming changes.
Priority 10 - My tenth program is to integrate
Metropolitan United Community College with the VCCS by proposing a unique
curricula wherein all 23 other community colleges and Metro can utilize an
electronic delivery classroom to conduct an annual intercollegiate debate
tournament, culminating with a face-to-face culminating tournament at the end of
each season. Such initiatives demonstrate our interconnectedness with our
sister colleges and with the historic Virginia legacy of spirited public debate
for which the Commonwealth should always be known. This initiative is already
being set in motion by myself in conjunction with the Chancellor's Professional
Grant system monitored by Dr. Susan Coffey.
Priority 11 - My eleventh, and as yet unfunded
priority, will be to seek to internationalize the curriculum in such a way as to
redress the outsourcing of American jobs. It will be my priority to infuse in
the American workforce an appreciation for the language, culture, and diversity
of those to whom we sell, and to inculcate and appreciation of the same skills
from those we wish to hire.
Priority 12 - My twelfth priority will be to invest
portions of surplus monies into an endowment fund, with the goal of indexing the
fund to the approximate return of 10% in the stock market achieved between 1929
and 2000. Monies well diversified and untouched over the long term
(20 or more years) can be expected to double approximately every 7.2 years using
the "rule of 72" and allowing for much wider fluctuations over the short term.
The town council may rest assured that my own personal portfolio has been so
harnessed since 1982 and has enjoyed a slightly higher rate of return than I
have mentioned in Priority 12. Bear in mind that we are talking of long
term performance and ruling out withdrawals or considerations of less than 8
years into the future. Monies needed within 8 years will not be so
invested.
The first five priorities required
some degree of specification and I agreed upon the following:
(i) transfer education should receive from 1/3 to ½ of our emphasis;
(ii) technical training should receive form ¼ to 1/3 or our emphasis;
(iii) developmental education should receive form 1/5 to ¼ of our emphasis;
(iv) workforce development should receive from 1/20 to 1/10 of our emphasis;(v)
financial aid, community service, and a competitive image should receive up to
1/20 of our emphasis.
There are future plans to address priorities 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11. Among other initiatives under study, I would like to consider incentivizing our most successful graduates by rebating portions of their tuition consistent with there future successes in attaining 4-year degrees. After our two-year incubation period, I would consider incentivizing our faculty by indexing their salary increases to increases in the consumer price index and to paying bonuses consistent with their productivity, retention rates, success earned by graduates, and by their contribution to the community and the learning community of the VCCS, the unique missions at Metro, and demonstrated excellence in teaching. We shall convene a series of committees to devise an optimum way to reward personnel for theses additional contributions to the well-being of Metro United Community College. Your advice and that from committees of study so organized will be very much appreciated.
3.
APPROPRIATE STUDENT SERVICE FUNCTIONS
Nearly 14% of the first year of monies needed to attract a student body at or
exceeding 5500 have been allocated to student services.
4. 5500
HEADCOUNT FOR 2ND YEAR OPERATIONS
An algorithm leading to 5519 students for the second year exceeds this
requirement set forth by the town council in Metro City by 19 students.
5.
SUPPLEMENTAL FUND OF AT LEAST $1 MILLION
The algorithm I present creates funds remaining from initially allotted monies
of $1,032,600, less $37,750 to comply with "Other Understandings" given me in
your guidance, and raises additional monies in the amount of $1,082,000 using
donations, foundation revenues, and workforce development revenues.
6. BUDGET RESERVE OF
$100,000
Item G in the budget meets this requirement.
7. COLLEGE FOUNDATION
The algorithm includes monies to establish the college foundation. I intend to
send the director to meet with Kathleen Holt who has placed Patrick Henry
Community College among the leading small colleges in America by way of
donations. Patrick Henry Community College obviously performs this function in
a manner superlative to its peers and we can learn how it has established
contributions leading to additional buildings without recourse to state funding.
![]()
The Excel attachment shows how 5519 students for year two were arrived at. I was able to arrive satisfy priorities (i), (ii), and (iii) shown on page 1 by hiring the “right” numbers of faculty in three categories: Arts & Science, Technical Training, and Developmental Education.
|
Thomas J. Meyer Final Exam for Dr. Marshall Smith April 9, 2004 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan Community College Budget (Plan1) |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General algorithm: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Step 1: Establish the minimum faculty needed to get 5,500 students to carry forth to the second year. |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Step 3: Compute the cost of educating the first year student body size |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Step 4: Present the faculty/student design for MCC in the form of a budget |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Step 5: Present a defense of the reasonableness of MCC's budget and design (using Microsoft Word) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Step 6: Observe the deviations from the expectations, and recalculate model parameters as necessary. |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Step 7: Revisit the assumptions of the model and revise as necessary. |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Step 8: Revisit assigned specific tasks within the model when and as these change.
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Establish the minimum faculty needed to get 5,500 students to carry forth to the second year. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Number of faculty |
Formula |
Resulting 2nd Year
Students Click Numbered |
||
|
|
Arts & Science Faculty |
28 |
"=e15*80-5" |
|
2235 |
|||
|
|
Technical Faculty |
|
19 |
"=e16*48-5" |
|
907 |
||
|
|
Developmental Faculty* |
20 |
"=e17*36-26" |
694 |
||||
|
|
Arts & Science Adjuncts |
20 |
"=e18*50" |
|
1000 |
|||
|
|
Technical Adjuncts |
|
10 |
"=e19*48" |
|
480 |
||
|
|
and *Dev. Fac. w/support assts. |
3 |
"=e31*65*.68" |
132 |
||||
|
|
|
|
Sum |
100 |
|
Sum |
5448 |
|
|
Note 1: In row 26 and 27 the minus five is non-traditional classes sending one student fewer onward. |
||||||||
|
Note 2: In row 28, a developmental faculty person has been selected to run Phi Theta Kappa; |
|
|||||||
|
consequently, that teacher teaches four, not five classes per semester. Developmental |
|
|||||||
|
faculty normally split 65 students among five sections (13 per section) and a fall and a |
|
|||||||
|
spring section of 13 students each fail to be taught; hence 26 is subtracted. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Program Students Carried Forward to Year 2 |
|
26 |
|||||
|
|
Phi Theta Kappa Students Carried Forward to Year 2 |
|
45 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sum of students carried forward to year 2 |
|
|
5519 |
students |
|||
|
|
(Must be at least 5500) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compute the first year Student Body Size |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Click Numbered Explanatory notes in red) |
|
|
|
Number of faculty |
Formula |
Resulting 1st Year Students |
||
|
Arts & Science Faculty |
28 |
|
"=e48*100" |
|
2800 |
|||
|
Technical Faculty |
|
19 |
|
"=e49*75" |
|
1425 |
||
|
*Developmental Faculty |
20 |
|
"=e50*65" |
|
1300 |
|||
|
Arts & Science Adjuncts |
20 |
|
"=e51*100" |
|
2000 |
|||
|
Technical Adjuncts |
|
10 |
|
"=e52*100" |
|
1000 |
||
|
*Dev. Faculty w. support assists. |
3 |
|
"=e53*65 |
|
195 |
|||
|
|
|
Sum |
100 |
|
|
Sum |
8525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intramural Athletics |
|
30 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill Ambassadors |
|
20 |
||
|
|
|
|
First Year Student Enrollment Sum |
|
8575 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compute the cost of educating the first year student body size |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
The cost of educating the first year student body size is the sum of items beginning with B65 |
|||||||
|
|
Each item's cost is further broken down below. |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Click Notes |
|
Per cent of total cost |
|
A. |
Student services |
|
|
|
$1,245,000 |
13.88 |
||
|
B. |
Financial aid |
|
|
|
$182,500 |
2.04 |
||
|
C. |
Arts & Science faculty and staff |
|
|
$2,665,000 |
29.72 |
|||
|
D. |
Technical faculty and staff |
|
|
$1,913,500 |
21.34 |
|||
|
E. |
Developmental faculty and staff |
|
|
$1,319,750 |
14.72 |
|||
|
F. |
Non-traditional delivery stipend |
|
|
$10,000 |
0.11 |
|||
|
G. |
Budget reserve |
|
|
|
$100,000 |
1.12 |
||
|
H. |
Library contribution |
|
|
|
$100,000 |
1.12 |
||
|
I. |
Workforce development |
|
|
$701,400 |
7.82 |
|||
|
J. |
Foundation |
|
|
|
$72,500 |
0.81 |
||
|
K. |
Intramural athletics |
|
|
|
$46,750 |
0.52 |
||
|
L. |
General academic administration |
|
$450,000 |
5.02 |
||||
|
M. |
Phi Theta Kappa |
|
|
|
$1,000 |
0.01 |
||
|
N. |
Ambassadors |
|
|
|
$40,000 |
0.45 |
||
|
O. |
Arbitrary extras and Other understandings |
|
|
|
$157,750 |
1.34 |
||
|
P. |
Total cost of educating the first year student body |
$9,005,150 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per cent of line P
Click Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teaching: C+D+E+F |
|
65.89 |
|
$5,908,250 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. |
|
45.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. |
|
32.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. |
|
22.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. |
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Click Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. |
Student services |
Number |
Each cost |
|
Sub-totals |
|
||
|
|
Counselors |
18 |
$49,750 |
|
$895,500 |
|
||
|
|
Unit administrators |
3 |
$56,500 |
|
$169,500 |
|
||
|
|
Support staff |
6 |
$30,000 |
|
$180,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,245,000 |
Category A subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. |
Financial aid |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Staff |
|
5 |
$36,500 |
|
$182,500 |
Category B subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. |
A&S faculty and staff 49 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Full-time A&S teachers 50 |
14 |
$58,000 |
|
$812,000 |
|
||
|
|
" " (lower wage) |
14 |
$42,000 |
|
$588,000 |
|
||
|
|
Unit administrators |
3 |
$70,000 |
|
$210,000 |
|
||
|
|
Support staff |
3 |
$30,000 |
|
$90,000 |
|
||
|
|
Instructional technologist 54 |
2 |
$47,500 |
|
$95,000 |
|
||
|
|
Librarian |
|
2 |
$36,000 |
|
$72,000 |
|
|
|
|
Full-time teachers travel/supplies 56 |
28 |
$1,000 |
|
$28,000 |
|
||
|
|
Adjunct Faculty |
20 |
$25,000 |
|
$500,000 |
|
||
|
|
Adjunct Faculty administrators 58 |
4 |
$52,500 |
|
$210,000 |
|
||
|
|
Adjunct Faculty support staff 59 |
2 |
30,000 |
|
$60,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2,665,000 |
Category C subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. |
Technical faculty and staff 61 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Full-time (FT) technical teachers 62 |
10 |
$52,000 |
|
$520,000 |
|
||
|
|
" " (lower wage) |
9 |
$44,000 |
|
$396,000 |
|
||
|
|
Unit administrators |
2 |
$68,750 |
|
$137,500 |
|
||
|
|
Support staff |
2 |
$30,000 |
|
$60,000 |
|
||
|
|
Lab technicians |
4 |
$28,750 |
|
$115,000 |
|
||
|
|
Library staff |
2 |
$36,000 |
|
$72,000 |
|
||
|
|
FT Tech. Faculty travel/supplies 68 |
19 |
$10,000 |
|
$190,000 |
|
||
|
|
Adjunct technical teachers 69 |
10 |
$28,000 |
|
$280,000 |
|
||
|
|
Adjunct unit administrators 70 |
2 |
$56,500 |
|
$113,000 |
|
||
|
|
Adjunct support staff |
1 |
$30,000 |
|
$30,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,913,500 |
Category D Subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. |
Developmental faculty and staff 73 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Develop. Faculty |
23 |
$43,500 |
|
$1,000,500 |
|
||
|
|
Dev. Faculty unit administrators 75 |
3 |
$58,750 |
|
$176,250 |
|
||
|
|
Dev. Faculty support staff 76 |
1 |
$30,000 |
|
$30,000 |
|
||
|
|
Dev. Faculty supplies/travel 77 |
23 |
$1,000 |
|
$23,000 |
|
||
|
|
Instructional support assistants 78 |
3 |
$30,000 |
|
$90,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,319,750 |
Category E Subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. |
Non-traditional delivery stipend |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
10 |
$1,000 |
|
$10,000 |
Category F Subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. |
Budget reserve |
|
|
|
$100,000 |
Category G Subtotal |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. |
Library contribution 83 |
|
|
|
$100,000 |
Category H Subtotal |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. |
Workforce development 84 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
W.D. Associates |
9 |
$45,750 |
|
$411,750 |
|
||
|
|
W.D. Unit administrators 86 |
3 |
$66,550 |
|
$199,650 |
|
||
|
|
W.D. Support staff |
3 |
$30,000 |
|
$90,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$701,400 |
Category I Subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. |
Foundation |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
F. Associates |
1 |
$42,500 |
|
$42,500 |
|
||
|
|
F. Support staff |
1 |
$30,000 |
|
$30,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$72,500 |
Category J Subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. |
Intramural athletics |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Student services assistant 94 |
1 |
$38,750 |
|
$38,750 |
|
||
|
|
Supplies |
|
|
$8,000 |
|
$8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$46,750 |
Category K Subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. |
General academic administration 97 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
G.A.A. Deans |
3 |
$90,000 |
|
$270,000 |
|
||
|
|
G.A.A. Support staff |
6 |
$30,000 |
|
$180,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$450,000 |
Category L Subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. |
Phi Theta Kappa |
|
|
|
$1,000 |
Category M Subtotal |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. |
Ambassadors |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Student Activities assistant 103 |
1 |
$35,000 |
|
$35,000 |
|
||
|
|
Clothing, travel, and related expenses 104 |
$5,000 |
|
$5,000 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$40,000 |
Category N Subtotal |
|
|
O. |
Arbitrary Extras and
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Arts&ScienceAdjunct travel/supplies107 |
20 |
$1,000 |
|
$20,000 |
|
||
|
|
Technical Adjunct Travel/supplies 108 |
10 |
$10,000 |
|
$100,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$120,000 |
Category O Subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present the faculty/student design for MCC in the form of a budget |
Click Notes |
|
|
|||||
|
|
Funds put forth for Metro City for Metropolitan Community College 110 |
$10,000,000 |
|
|||||
|
|
Funds expended in providing first year of college services 111 |
$9,005,150 |
|
|||||
|
|
Funds
remaining from initially allotted monies |
$994,850 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monies raised during the first year of operations: |
|
|
|
||||
|
Q. |
Donor contribution from pleasure over Ambassadors |
$25,000 |
|
|||||
|
R. |
Foundation revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Number |
Funds raised |
overhead (15%) 115 |
|
|
||
|
|
Associates |
1 |
$100,000 |
|
$15,000.00 |
$85,000.00 |
|
|
|
S. |
Workforce Development revenues |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Number |
Funds raised 118 |
overhd. (20%) |
Net amount |
| ||