Metropolitan United Community College

Meeting tomorrow's challenges with today's vision
Office of the President

 

April 15, 2004

 From:  Thomas J. Meyer

Subject:   Final Exam – The Modern Community College
To:   Dr. Smith

 Dear Dr. Smith: 

As the founding president of Metropolitan United Community College (MUCC), it is my pleasure to present to you and to the community of Metro City this general budget proposal and its rationale in the form of an Internet Explorer webpage for your approval.  This webpage has twelve dozen linked bookmarks enabling you to move through the parts of the document and to examine numbered explanatory notes at the click of a mouse.  To obtain these advantages, I wish to say that the preferred method for studying the document is to view it online.  However, if you must print yourself a copy, remember to print webpage documents in using your printer's "landscape" setting rather than its traditional "portrait" setting.  The decisions regarding academic programs, the faculty, the academic support services and staff, and the institutional support services and staff have been mine to ponder, and I accept the responsibility for initiating the budgetary proposals, and coordinating the efforts of the human resources I have thought it in the interest of Metro City to hire to make part of my “team.” 

I have listed some of the assumptions underlying the nature of your directive to me.  I have met, and in some cases exceeded the 7 criteria you established for me.  I am pleased to report that your expectations and those of the town council can be achieved in a frugal manner that does not compromise the comprehensive nature of MUCC, that I have ignored the political temptation to receive monies in return for hiring a relative of a state senator unless that person compete and be chosen as best qualified, and then only if the senator's proposal first undergoes the scrutiny of yourself and the town council and receives your consideration and recommendation for my approval.

In every other respect you will find that I am prepared to utilize all of the resources allotted in the manner which I believe most clearly earns your approval.  When on three occasions additional judgments on my part were necessary, I made those decisions which are open to you now in the following bullet statements:

bullet

  In one instance, "travel and supplies for adjunct faculty,"  your guidance was not as clear as I might have hoped for.  Some colleges might exclude such monies for adjuncts; but a case can be made for their inclusion and I believed the expenditure would enhance the professional development and morale of the adjuncts, lead to improved classes and equipment in classes taught by adjuncts, bring professional comradeship and a sense of inclusion to all faculty full and part-time, and in a conservative sense, meet with your studied approval. 

bullet

In a second instance, under Other Understandings, although I hired in excess of 20 Technical full-time and adjunct faculty combined, so as not to be criticized by you I hired a Public Relations Consultant in the event my 19 Full-time Technical faculty fell short of your expectation.  To insure a comprehensive technical training program I "beefed" up adjuncts of all kinds by providing them travel and supply allotments.  In the case of technical training programs this amounted to $10,000 per faculty member, ($100,000 in the case of all adjunct technical faculty) and was done to impress upon you that I was cognizant of the emphasis you placed on balancing the missions within a comprehensive community college.

bullet

In a third instance, I discovered an error in your reasoning about the parameters, and though I followed your guidance, this "trumpet call" caused me to include some procedures for making the review of the budgetary process, its assumptions, its parameters, and its town council guidance part and parcel of a recurring annual process in self-improvement of our administrative procedures.  The particular error to which I refer was the parameter in retention.  The guidance said that  full time faculty generate 80 second year students for second year attendance.  However, on careful reflection I noted that by teaching five classes per semester, it would be better to re-estimate retention as 80 per semester, and perhaps as much as 160 per academic year.  We shall appoint my vice-presidents of academic affairs and financial affairs to co-chair a committee whose purpose is to recommend amendments to our assumptions and parameters for our next usage of our budgetary model.  To console you about this particular shortcoming, let me tell you that no model captures reality in all its complexity, and we would error if we believed that it did.  May I include a short story to that effect from my own military experience?  I remember the first use of models and sophisticated flight simulators that initially, and on paper, allowed computers to generate great-circle routes for military aircraft dispatched on a moment's notice.  Since I helped direct our airborne warning and control (AWAC) crews to global positions with such minimum response times, I was practical enough to realize that sending AWACs aircraft from their home station to the Middle East in the event of an immediate threat there should not be done by computer flight planning alone.  Such great circle - shortest distance - flight planning took the airplanes over downtown Moscow, and so the results of instant modeling could not be approved.

You can "mouse about" in the following document found beneath my signature if you have opened it successfully as the FrontPage document on Internet as I created it.  It will run on Internet Explorer, but I dissuade you from running it on Netscape Navigator.  Send me your questions, or considerations so that I may allay your concerns, or sharpen your sensitivities about the funding process.  If I don't have the immediate answer, I will provide you an approximate time when I expect to be able to respond to your needs.  Thank you for the opportunity to serve you and the people of Metropolitan City.  Should you need to link to the document directly, use the following directions:

1st, type http://www.ph.vccs.edu/eco into Internet Explorer.
2nd, scroll down my "homepage" nearly to the bottom, and click on the word "Administration."
3rd, scroll down the page known as "Administration" beyond work being completed for "Statistics" and click on the link beneath Dr. Marshall which should take you to Metropolitan United Community College.
4th, if you choose to ignore the advantages of a  linked document and simply wish to print the document, use "landscape" (11" X 8.5") rather than "portrait" (8.5" X 11")on your printer settings.

If I may be of further assistance, do not fail to ask!

Sincerely yours,

Thomas J. Meyer

Thomas J. Meyer
President, Metropolitan United Community College
Metro City, VA
tmeyer@ph.vccs.edu
(276) 656-0283

Introduction

                 To enlighten the community and solidify its support I have paid particular attention to the guidance I received from you, and am responding to your needs using Microsoft Word to present my rationale, and using Microsoft Excel to express the budgetary numbers.

 Assumptions:
1.  My understanding is that the state legislature has offered initial support subsidizing the first three years of the core staff of the college, that is, 13 positions  and appropriate support staff beginning with my own presidency and including six vice-presidents; and six directors. 

2.  In addition the legislature has provided the entire cost of physical plant maintenance to include personnel, supervisors, supplies, equipment, and utilities.

General Instructions to the reader:

1.  Use the following table of bookmarks to take you to the various parts of this budget rationale and included Excel spreadsheet.
2.  Use the back button (arrow) on you computer to return to a previous position.


Introduction

(Each underlined portion is a link; click your mouse over
the link to reach that portion of the document quickly.)
 

The Budget Rationale The Excel Spreadsheet

Each line in the Excel Spreadsheet is numbered sequentially.
Clicking each red number takes you to
  Numbered Explanatory Notes for that line nunber in the budget spreadsheet.

 

Part I -
Meeting Seven Criteria

1. Personnel
2. Comprehensiveness and Presidential Priorities
3. Student Services
4. 5500 Headcount
5. Supplemental Fund >=
$1 million
6. Budget Reserve >=
$100,000
7. College Foundation

 

Step1
Establish the minimum faculty needed to get 5,500 students
to carry forth to the second year
 
Step 2
Compute the first year Student Body Size
 
Step 3
Compute the cost of educating the first year
student body size

 
Step 4
Present the faculty/student design for MCC
in the form of a budget

 
 

Part II -
MUCC Budget Rationale

Numbered explanatory notes
These tell you how each line so numbered in the Spreadsheet was computed.  When applicable, a justification is also included on yellow background.

 

 

Part III - Making the Budget into a
Continuous Planning Cycle
Step 5  Budget defense in Word
Step 6  Deviations and re-calculations of parameters
Step 7  Re-visiting and revising assumptions
Step 8  Re-visiting assigned tasks

Meeting Tomorrow's Challenges with Today's Vision

 

THE BUDGET RATIONALE

PART I - MEETING THE SEVEN CRITERIA 

                Per my question to you via Teletechnet, I am also relieved of the responsibility for creating the location, buildings, and grounds, so that my report will consist only of a budget and rationale for the use of $10 million provided by Metro City for the initial year’s budget, and is subject to meeting seven criteria mentioned on the second page of your written guidance to me.  I shall address each of your specific tasking requirements briefly, and then continue my rationale in more general terms:

1.  PERSONNEL

Regarding the task of creating personnel slots for faculty, administrators, and staff not listed above, the Excel spreadsheet will provide you monetary costs for hiring in budget categories A through P the necessary persons to simultaneously satisfy requirements 2 through 7.  Items F, G, H, M and O in that list do NOT involve expenditures for personnel, and refer respectively to monies allotted to non-traditional delivery stipends, budget reserve, library contribution, Phi Theta Kappa, and arbitrary extras.  The reasons for a category know as arbitrary extras are that initial guidance from you was not clear as to whether or not travel and supplies monies should be made available to adjunct faculty in the arts and sciences and adjunct faculty in the technical training areas.  Not wishing to fall short of your expectations, I budgeted for supplies and travel for the adjuncts as well as the full-time A&S and full-time technical training faculty.  The second reason for including these questionable arbitrary expenses was that it will be a positive morale builder and professional development activity encouraging adjuncts to compete for permanent positions and to bring to the community college students their best talents and tools and those which we can afford to provide for them.  When you study budget categories A through P you will also notice that items K and N involve more than personnel expenditures.  Items K and N include monies that provide supplies for intramural athletics and clothing, travel, and related expenses for student ambassadors.

 2. COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY COLLEGE  (The priorities of the college)

To design an appropriate balance among elements of the mission statement for Metropolitan United Community College I sought to include flexible components responsive to changing needs.  Without setting  component sizes concretely, I sought to achieve results for Metro City students wherein:
Priority 1 -  the transfer function of sending our 2-year graduates on to 4-year institutions would have the highest priority;
Priority 2 - the teaching of technical training in preparation for vocational employment upon completion of certificates or diplomas became the second priority; 
Priority 3 - the provision of remediation in learning so as to equip otherwise incapable students to succeed in college became my third priority;
Priority 4 - the development of community-based training programs to aid and attract industry to Metro City became my fourth priority;
Priority 5 - the construction of synergistic services that would provide financial aid, community service, and competitive image of success became my fifth priority;
Priority 6 - the underwriting of a college endowment fund became my sixth priority as a means of solidifying continued support and good will with the frugal city fathers who need to know that we have provided for our own posterity;
Priority 7 - the continuing dialogue with the legislature regarding political monies not wholly academic in nature I regard as my seventh priority;
Priority 8 - my eighth priority is to invent an alumni association from which we can continue to draw good will and future interest; 
Priority 9 - my ninth priority is to pay attention to federal funding and grant monies of all sorts so as to be responsive to forthcoming changes. 
Priority 10 - My tenth program is to integrate Metropolitan United Community College with the VCCS by proposing a unique curricula wherein all 23 other community colleges and Metro can utilize an electronic delivery classroom to conduct an annual intercollegiate debate tournament, culminating with a face-to-face culminating tournament at the end of each season.  Such initiatives demonstrate our interconnectedness with our sister colleges and with the historic Virginia legacy of spirited public debate for which the Commonwealth should always be known.  This initiative is already being set in motion by myself in conjunction with the Chancellor's Professional Grant system monitored by Dr. Susan Coffey.
Priority 11 - My eleventh, and as yet unfunded priority, will be to seek to internationalize the curriculum in such a way as to redress the outsourcing of American jobs.  It will be my priority to infuse in the American workforce an appreciation for the language, culture, and diversity of those to whom we sell, and to inculcate and appreciation of the same skills from those we wish to hire.
Priority 12 - My twelfth priority will be to invest portions of surplus monies into an endowment fund, with the goal of indexing the fund to the approximate return of 10% in the stock market achieved between 1929 and 2000.  Monies well diversified and  untouched over the long term (20 or more years) can be expected to double approximately every 7.2 years using the "rule of 72" and allowing for much wider fluctuations over the short term.  The town council may rest assured that my own personal portfolio has been so harnessed since 1982 and has enjoyed a slightly higher rate of return than I have mentioned in Priority 12.  Bear in mind that we are talking of long term performance and ruling out withdrawals or considerations of less than 8 years into the future.  Monies needed within 8 years will not be so invested. 

The first five priorities required some degree of specification and I agreed upon the following:
(i) transfer education should receive from 1/3 to ½ of our emphasis;
(ii) technical training should receive form ¼ to 1/3 or our emphasis;
(iii) developmental education should receive form 1/5 to ¼ of our emphasis;
(iv) workforce development should receive from 1/20 to 1/10 of our emphasis;(v) financial aid, community service, and a competitive image should receive up to 1/20 of our emphasis.
 

There are future plans to address priorities 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11.  Among other initiatives under study,  I would like to consider incentivizing our most successful graduates by rebating portions of their tuition consistent with there future successes in attaining 4-year degrees.  After our two-year incubation period, I would consider incentivizing our faculty by indexing their salary increases to increases in the consumer price index and to paying bonuses consistent with their productivity, retention rates, success earned by graduates, and by their contribution to the community and the learning community of the VCCS,  the unique missions at Metro, and demonstrated excellence in teaching.  We shall convene a series of committees to devise an optimum way to reward personnel for theses additional contributions to the well-being of Metro United Community College.  Your advice and that from committees of study so organized will be very much appreciated.

3.  APPROPRIATE STUDENT SERVICE FUNCTIONS
Nearly 14% of the first year of monies needed to attract a student body at or exceeding 5500 have been allocated to student services. 

4.  5500 HEADCOUNT FOR 2ND YEAR OPERATIONS
An algorithm leading to 5519 students for the second year exceeds this requirement set forth by the town council in Metro City by 19 students. 

5.  SUPPLEMENTAL FUND OF AT LEAST $1 MILLION
The algorithm I present creates funds remaining from initially allotted monies of $1,032,600, less $37,750 to comply with "Other Understandings" given me in your guidance, and raises additional monies in the amount of $1,082,000 using donations, foundation revenues, and workforce development revenues. 

6.  BUDGET RESERVE OF $100,000
Item G in the budget meets this requirement. 

7.  COLLEGE FOUNDATION
The algorithm includes monies to establish the college foundation.  I intend to send the director to meet with Kathleen Holt who has placed Patrick Henry Community College among the leading small colleges in America by way of donations.  Patrick Henry Community College obviously performs this function in a manner superlative to its peers and we can learn how it has established contributions leading to additional buildings without recourse to state funding.

 

THE EXCEL SPREADSHEET

 

The Excel attachment shows how 5519 students for year two were arrived at.  I was able to arrive satisfy priorities (i), (ii), and (iii) shown on page 1 by hiring the “right” numbers of faculty in three categories: Arts & Science, Technical Training, and Developmental Education.

 

Thomas J. Meyer  Final Exam  for Dr. Marshall Smith  April 9, 2004 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Metropolitan Community College Budget (Plan1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General algorithm:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Step 1:  Establish the minimum faculty needed to get 5,500 students to carry forth to the second year.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Step 2Compute the first year Student Body Size

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Step 3:  Compute the cost of educating the first year student body size

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Step 4Present the faculty/student design for MCC in the form of a budget

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Step 5:  Present a defense of the reasonableness of MCC's budget and design (using Microsoft Word)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Step 6:  Observe the deviations from the expectations, and recalculate model parameters as necessary.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Step 7:  Revisit the assumptions of the model and revise as necessary.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Step 8:  Revisit assigned specific tasks within the model when and as these change.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Step 1:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Establish the minimum faculty needed to get 5,500 students to carry forth to the second year.

 

 

 

 

 

Number of faculty

Formula

Resulting 2nd Year Students  Click Numbered
                                            Explanatory notes

                                                   (in red)

 

Arts & Science Faculty

28

"=e15*80-5"

 

2235

1

 

Technical Faculty

 

19

"=e16*48-5"

 

907

 2

 

Developmental Faculty*

20

"=e17*36-26"

694

 3

 

Arts & Science Adjuncts

20

"=e18*50"

 

1000

 4

 

Technical Adjuncts

 

10

"=e19*48"

 

480

 5

 

and *Dev. Fac. w/support assts.

3

"=e31*65*.68"

132

 6

 

 

 

Sum

100

 

Sum

5448

 7

Note 1: In row 26 and 27  the minus five is non-traditional classes sending one student fewer onward.

Note 2: In row 28, a developmental faculty person has been selected to run Phi Theta Kappa;

 

           consequently, that teacher teaches four, not five classes per semester. Developmental

 

           faculty normally split 65 students among five sections (13 per section) and a fall and a

 

           spring section of 13 students each fail to be taught; hence 26 is subtracted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Athletic Program Students Carried Forward to Year 2

 

26

 8

 

Phi Theta Kappa Students Carried Forward to Year 2

 

45

 9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 10

 

Sum of students carried forward to year 2

 

 

5519

students

 

(Must be at least 5500)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Step 2:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Compute the first year Student Body Size

 

 

 

 

 

Click Numbered                       Explanatory notes in red)

 

 

 

Number of faculty

Formula

Resulting 1st Year Students

 11

Arts & Science Faculty

28

 

"=e48*100"

 

2800

 12

Technical Faculty

 

19

 

"=e49*75"

 

1425

 13

*Developmental Faculty

20

 

"=e50*65"

 

1300

 14

Arts & Science Adjuncts

20

 

"=e51*100"

 

2000

 15

Technical Adjuncts

 

10

 

"=e52*100"

 

1000

 16

*Dev. Faculty w. support assists.

3

 

"=e53*65

 

195

 17

 

 

Sum

100

 

 

Sum

8525

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 18

 

 

 

 

Intramural Athletics

 

30

 19

 

 

 

 

Goodwill Ambassadors

 

20

 20

 

 

 

First Year Student Enrollment Sum

 

8575

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Step 3:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Compute the cost of educating the first year student body size

 

 

 

 

The cost of educating the first year student body size is the sum of items beginning with B65

 

Each item's cost is further broken down below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click Notes
(in red)
 

 

Per cent of total cost

A.

Student services

 

 

 

 21

$1,245,000

13.88

B.

Financial aid

 

 

 

 22

$182,500

2.04

C.

Arts & Science faculty and staff

 

 

 23

$2,665,000

29.72

D.

Technical faculty and staff

 

 

 24

$1,913,500

21.34

E.

Developmental faculty and staff

 

 

 25

$1,319,750

14.72

F.

Non-traditional delivery stipend

 

 

 26

$10,000

0.11

G.

Budget reserve

 

 

 

 27

$100,000

1.12

H.

Library contribution

 

 

 

 28

$100,000

1.12

I.

Workforce development

 

 

 29

$701,400

7.82

J.

Foundation

 

 

 

 30

$72,500

0.81

K.

Intramural athletics

 

 

 

 31

$46,750

0.52

L.

General academic administration

 

 32

$450,000

5.02

M.

Phi Theta Kappa

 

 

 

 33

$1,000

0.01

N.

Ambassadors

 

 

 

 34

$40,000

0.45

O.

Arbitrary extras and Other understandings

 

 

 

 35

$157,750

1.34

P.

Total cost of educating the first year student body

 36

$9,005,150

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Per cent of line P Click Notes
                           (in red)

 

 

 

 

Teaching: C+D+E+F

 

65.89

 37

 

$5,908,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 38

C.

 

45.11

 

 

 

 

 

 39

D.

 

32.39

 

 

 

 

 

 40

E.

 

22.34

 

 

 

 

 

 41

F.

 

0.17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click Notes
(in red)

 

 

 

 

 

A.

Student services

 42

Number

Each cost

 

Sub-totals

 

 

Counselors

 43

18

$49,750

 

$895,500

 

 

Unit administrators

 44

3

$56,500

 

$169,500

 

 

Support staff

 45

6

$30,000

 

$180,000

 

 

 

 

 46

 

 

 

$1,245,000

Category A subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B.

Financial aid

 47

 

 

 

 

 

 

Staff

 

 48

5

$36,500

 

$182,500

Category B subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C.

A&S faculty and staff             49

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full-time A&S teachers            50

14

$58,000

 

$812,000

 

 

"     " (lower wage)              

 51

14

$42,000

 

$588,000

 

 

Unit administrators

 52

3

$70,000

 

$210,000

 

 

Support staff

 53

3

$30,000

 

$90,000

 

 

Instructional technologist          54

2

$47,500

 

$95,000

 

 

Librarian               

 

 55

2

$36,000

 

$72,000

 

 

Full-time teachers travel/supplies  56

28

$1,000

 

$28,000

 

 

Adjunct Faculty

 57

20

$25,000

 

$500,000

 

 

Adjunct Faculty administrators  58

4

$52,500

 

$210,000

 

 

Adjunct Faculty support staff     59

2

30,000

 

$60,000

 

 

 

 

 60 

 

 

 

$2,665,000

Category C subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

D.

Technical faculty and staff     61

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full-time (FT) technical teachers 62

10

$52,000

 

$520,000

 

 

"     " (lower wage)

 63

9

$44,000

 

$396,000

 

 

Unit administrators

 64

2

$68,750

 

$137,500

 

 

Support staff

 65

2

$30,000

 

$60,000

 

 

Lab technicians

 66

4

$28,750

 

$115,000

 

 

Library staff

 67

2

$36,000

 

$72,000

 

 

FT Tech. Faculty travel/supplies  68

19

$10,000

 

$190,000

 

 

Adjunct technical teachers        69

10

$28,000

 

$280,000

 

 

Adjunct unit administrators       70

2

$56,500

 

$113,000

 

 

Adjunct support staff           

 71

1

$30,000

 

$30,000

 

 

 

 

 72

 

 

 

$1,913,500

Category D Subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

E.

Developmental faculty and staff  73

 

 

 

 

 

Develop. Faculty

 74

23

$43,500

 

$1,000,500

 

 

Dev. Faculty unit administrators 75

3

$58,750

 

$176,250

 

 

Dev. Faculty support staff         76

1

$30,000

 

$30,000

 

 

Dev. Faculty supplies/travel      77

23

$1,000

 

$23,000

 

 

Instructional support assistants 78

3

$30,000

 

$90,000

 

 

 

 

 79

 

 

 

$1,319,750

Category E Subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F.

Non-traditional delivery stipend

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 80 

10

$1,000

 

$10,000

Category F Subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

G.

Budget reserve

 81

 

 

 

$100,000

Category G Subtotal

 

 

 

 82

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H.

Library contribution              83

 

 

 

$100,000

Category H Subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I.

Workforce development       84

 

 

 

 

 

 

W.D. Associates

85

9

$45,750

 

$411,750

 

 

W.D. Unit administrators         86

3

$66,550

 

$199,650

 

 

W.D. Support staff

87

3

$30,000

 

$90,000

 

 

 

 

 88

 

 

 

$701,400

Category I Subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

J.

Foundation

 89

 

 

 

 

 

 

F. Associates

 90

1

$42,500

 

$42,500

 

 

F. Support staff

 91

1

$30,000

 

$30,000

 

 

 

 

 92

 

 

 

$72,500

Category J Subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

K.

Intramural athletics

 93

 

 

 

 

 

 

Student services assistant        94

1

$38,750

 

$38,750

 

 

Supplies

 

 95

 

$8,000

 

$8,000

 

 

 

 

 96

 

 

 

$46,750

Category K Subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

L.

General academic administration 97

 

 

 

 

 

G.A.A. Deans

 98

3

$90,000

 

$270,000

 

 

G.A.A. Support staff

 99

6

$30,000

 

$180,000

 

 

 

 

 100

 

 

 

$450,000

Category L Subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

M.

Phi Theta Kappa

 101

 

 

 

$1,000

Category M Subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

N.

Ambassadors

 102

 

 

 

 

 

 

Student Activities assistant      103

1

$35,000

 

$35,000

 

 

Clothing, travel, and related expenses  104

$5,000

 

$5,000

 

 

 

 

 105

 

 

 

$40,000

Category N Subtotal

O.

Arbitrary Extras and Other
Understandsings

 106

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arts&ScienceAdjunct travel/supplies107

20

$1,000

 

$20,000

 

 

Technical Adjunct Travel/supplies  108

10

$10,000

 

$100,000

 

 

 

 

 109

 

 

 

$120,000

Category O Subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Step 4:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Present the faculty/student design for MCC in the form of a budget

Click Notes
(in red)

 

 

 

Funds put forth for Metro City for Metropolitan Community College               110

$10,000,000

 

 

Funds expended in providing first year of college services                            111

$9,005,150

 

 

Funds remaining from initially allotted monies
( $10 million - Line 36 )

112

$994,850

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monies raised during the first year of operations:

 

 

 

Q.

Donor contribution from pleasure over Ambassadors

 113

$25,000

 

R.

Foundation revenues

 

 

 

 114

 

 

 

 

Number

Funds raised

overhead (15%) 115

 

 

 

Associates

1

$100,000

 

$15,000.00

 116

$85,000.00

 

S.

Workforce Development revenues

 

 117

 

 

 

 

Number

Funds raised    118

overhd. (20%)

Net amount